Wilmington Faith & Values

Politics » Election

The Second Inaugural and the Bible

Several books and news articles recently have observed that second presidential inaugural addresses are rarely memorable.

The exception is Lincoln’s, considered one of the finest pieces of American oratory ever.

Show Caption |

(RNS1-jan21) President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama attend a church service at Metropolitan African Methodist Episcopal Church in Washington, D.C., on Inauguration Day, Sunday, Jan. 20, 2013. Credit: For use with RNS-INAUGURATION-PRAY, transmitted on January 21, 2013, RNS photo by Pete Souza/The White House.

Much is made in the news media of which Bibles President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden use when taking their oaths of office, but what is really noteworthy about Lincoln’s address is not which Bible he used but the extent to which he drew on the King James Bible for his speech.

The words "wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces" are an allusion to the Fall of Man in the book of Genesis. As a result of Adam's sin, God tells Adam that henceforth, "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return" (Gen. 3:19).

Lincoln's phrase, "but let us judge not, that we be not judged," alludes to the words of Jesus in Matthew 7:1, which in the King James Bible reads, "Judge not, that ye be not judged."

Lincoln quotes another of the sayings of Jesus: "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh." The language comes from Matthew 18:7; a similar discourse by Jesus appears in Luke 17:1.

The quotation “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether” is from Psalm 19:9 in the King James Bible.

A further example of Lincoln’s use of the Bible is found in his 1858 comments when he accepted the Republican nomination as candidate for the U. S. Senate. In his introductory remarks he paraphrased Matthew 12:25 and said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”

Lincoln was hesitant to associate himself with any organized church, but he read the Bible extensively, and quoted from it regularly. Furthermore, he expected his audience to recognize the source of the quotations and allusions.

That probably would not be the case today.

 

Video courtesy of The Washington Post.

Topics: Politics, Election, Government & Politics
Beliefs: Christian - Protestant
Tags: bibles, lincoln, obama, second inaugural address

Philip Stine

Philip Stine writes about the Bible and scripture translations for WilmingtonFAVS. He also once cracked a joke with Pope John Paul II.
View Contributor Profile

You must acquire rights to repost our content. Log in now for permission to download and reprint or repost this article.

Comments

Add Your Comment

If a person is called Richard, what is their name?

Related Stories

White Christian voters no longer hold the keys to the White House

What the Public Religion Research Institute has concluded since, however, has farther-reaching implications: that relying on white Christian voters will never again spell national electoral success -- especially for the GOP.
More | Comments (0)

Soldiers’ Bibles exhibit a walk through American history

A New York museum's exhibit of soldier's Bibles show how our men and women in the armed forces found "comfort in difficult times."
More | Comments (0)

Analysis: Film revives questions about Abraham Lincoln’s faith, but offers few answers

The release of the new Steven Spielberg movie "Lincoln" has resurrected more than the physical presence of America's 16th president. It has also brought to the fore again questions about his faith. Was he a Christian? Was he an atheist?
More | Comments (0)

Belief Bytes: Your Thursday Religion News Roundup

Thursday’s Religion News Roundup: Obama’s big gay fallout, Romney’s dilemma, Ryan budget redux, Richard Land’s new apology.
More | Comments (0)

GOP Dilemma: Youth v. Evangelicals

“Can the Republicans Be Saved From Obsolescence?,” Robert Draper’s cover story in yesterday’s New York Times Magazine, focuses on the GOP’s digital backwardness, but the point of the piece is not technological but demographic.
More | Comments (0)

Sign In



Forgot Password?

You also can sign in with Facebook or Twitter if you've connected your account to them.

Sign In Using Facebook

Sign In Using Twitter